Energy solutions that pay off

Chemical Plant

Installation of 3.8 MW turbogenerator unit

A boiler manufacturing company approached RUSTRADE LLC. They had submitted a proposal for a boiler house to a chemical plant, which subsequently froze the boiler house construction project.

The reason for freezing was the long payback period. The customer was ready for increased investment provided the project payback period was reduced.

1

Reduce boiler house construction project payback period

2

Increase investment economic efficiency

Based on calculations performed by RUSTRADE LLC specialists, a steam turbine with a 3.8 MW generator was proposed.

When implementing the boiler house construction project complete with turbogenerator unit, the payback calculations included 3.8 MWh of electricity in addition to produced steam.

Thanks to additional income from own electricity generation, payback period was reduced by almost half.

Comparison of project implementation options:

# Parameter Initial Project RUSTRADE Solution
1 TGU power, MW 3.8
2 Initial project
Project type Boiler house only Boiler house + TGU
Payback period Long (project frozen) Reduced by ~2 times
3 Operating parameters
Electricity generation, MWh 0 3.8
Additional generation income No Yes
4 Economic effect, RUB/year 87,600,000
5 Payback period, years 0.62
1

RUSTRADE LLC solution fully meets the set objectives

2

Project payback period reduced to 0.62 years (about 7.5 months)

3

Economic effect — 87.6 million RUB/year

0 M ₽
Economic effect per year
5 years
Project payback period

Get Consultation

Our specialists will help you choose the optimal solution for your enterprise and calculate the economic effect

All Questions & Answers

Answers to frequently asked questions about turbogenerator units, delivery times and cooperation terms

Go to FAQ
Rustrade

Energy solutions that pay off

Home Engineering Turbines Turbogenerators Blades Oil Coolers Condensers About Cases News & Articles FAQ Cooperation Contacts